The effect of the Philippine Revolution

The center of the Filipino varietyThis investigating assesses the extent of the Philippine Revolution had on the Philippine culture. In aim to analyze the effectuate of the variation on the political structure of the Philippines, the investigation pass on involve what the how it was several years beforehand the Philippine Revolution, to a fault known as the nation Power Revolution. The political structure by and by the Philippine Revolution entrust alike be researched. This research will be done to evaluate the changes in the over completely political structure. The dickens primary sources for this investigation include Monina Mercados A plenty Power The Philippine Revolution of 1986 An Eyewitness History along with Florentino Rodaos book, The Philippine Revolution of 1986 banausic Lives In Extraordinary Times.The two sources that will be used will be analyzed according to its origin, propose, limitations and value.Summary of EvidenceThe online article What Was Peo ple Power? states that the revolution was a non-violent movement of united Filipino citizens. They were offer by Corazon Cory Aquino, the wife of Benigno Aquino, a leading opponent of the rule of chairwo universe Ferdinand Marcos, an advocate for the opposition of their Nationalist Party. This movement was a success because it direct to the overthrow of Ferdinand Marcos. After the overthrow, Corazon Aquino won presidency.Ferdinand Marcos was a corrupt leader. He was chair of the Philippines for twenty years (for two terms), from 1965 to 1986.1After military personnel War II, Ferdinand Marcos emerged from World War II with the reputation of being the greatest Filipino opposition leader of the war and the most decorated soldier in the U.S. fortify forces.2Before being chairperson of the Philippines, Marcos had been the leader of the Ang Maharlika. The Ang Maharlika was a secret safeguard that Ferdinand Marcos had created. It was said that this secret electric defense was mad e up of spies and revolutionaries (assassins), in actually, the resistance consisted of counterfeiters, thieves, and gunmen. The Ang Maharlika was a guerilla force in northern Luzon. As electric chair Marcos excelled in achieving infrastructure development along with international diplomacy but despite these great achievements he, along with his administration, was extremely authoritarian, corrupt they were also politically repressive, and they also violated human rights.In 1983, Benigno Aquino Jr., a senator and governor of Tarlac who inappropriate Marcos, was assassinated due to a gunshot to his head. President Marcos, along with the take a breather of his politics, was involved in the assassination. This assassination became the catalyst of the People Power Revolution. From 1972 up through 1981, Marcos government passed a martial law that repressed the passels freedom. He claimed that it was to create New Society based on new friendly and political value. Despite the laws success in reducing crime, it frightened any(prenominal) political opponents causing them to go into exile. The same goes for the rest of the people. They could not switch a say in anything. Things were active to change for the better formerly Ferdinand Marcos was exiled.After the revolution, Corazon Aquinos presidency was the start of democracy for the Filipinos. The new government, the Constitutional bearing gave them a new constitution. It was ratified on February 2, 1987. The Constitution then went into effect on the eleventh of that month. It diminished presidential powers from declaring martial law. The Constitution also restored the bicameral congress.Evaluation of SourcesThe source Mercados A People Power The Philippine Revolution of 1986 An Eyewitness History was written by Monina Mercado. It tells the story of the revolution that exiled Ferdinand Marcos from power through a collection of various stories by many different people told in their own words. It was publishe d in 1987 devising it somewhat of a credible source. This is said because it was written after, if not during, the revolution. This subject bet that it contained real, current certifyation. On the other hand, being published so presently after the revolution had occurred means that it will not have all the necessary information. If it was to describe the set up of the Peoples Power Revolution, it would only mention the effects that occurred only between that one-year epoch period. It would not encompass the effects over ten or twenty years. It appears that the purpose of the source is to inform readers ab forbidden the Philippine Revolution of 1986 and her point of view on the situation. A People Power The Philippine Revolution of 1986 An Eyewitness History is limit because it is biased. The author is clearly a supporter of Corazon Aquino. She does not write active what the people on the other side of the revolution thought. The sources value is questionable. It does its pu rpose and informs readers of the revolution and it does sheds light on the events which toppled the Marcos dictatorship.The second source is The Philippine Revolution of 1986 modal(a) Lives in Extraordinary Times was published in 2001, qualification it a valuable source. This book is the most recent resource out of both of the sources. It was written by Florentino Rodao. The author of this book goes into detail round gender and ethnicity during the Revolution corruption in the second-half of the nineteenth century the circuitions intra-Asian get by the influx of refugees to Cavite, which affected the rivalry between Bonifacio and Aguinaldo the travails of the Francis back tooth friars and the hopes and fears of a Spanish soldier as seen through his letters. The purpose of this book was to describe the age in which they were ruled by the Spanish and when they were freed. With this being said, this was not a very valuable book for this investigation. It does not completely talk virtually the issue at hand, the People Power Revolution thus adjustment this book much to a greater extent. It does not go into depth about the revolution, preferably the time before it. In a sense, this book is valuable because it gives soil information on how the people were before the revolution, therefore allowing for a proportion to be made between the time periods.D. AnalysisEvery superstar kind of revolution brings about change. The Philippine Revolution, in this case brought about a positive change. After 1986, there were many more accessible and governmental changes. The Philippine Revolution brought about great social changes. The people were not to be socially repressed any more. People could say their mind without getting reprimanded. The revolution, along with all other revolutions, was a time of military and political struggle for power. This thoroughly affected the people. Even before the Peoples Power Revolution Filipinos had been military and socially repres sed because of the Spanish. After gaining their freedom, they had teeny-weeny time to be their own to be free, even if it was just for a little while. They were not technically used to having such freedom, so when Marcos became president there was not much resistance. With all the changes being made end-to-end the Philippines, it is not shocking that, socially, the country changed. This comes to show, why there was not resistance to Ferdinand Marcos in the beginning.While the Philippine revolution overthrew such a powerful, arrogant leader, it left much of the old centralized power structure unchanged. The U.S. compose retained major influence through military aid and bases. The Philippine military remained intact under Defense look Enrile, the same man who had gotten thick from political connections while serving as Defense Minister under Marcos. The new President, Corazon Aquino, was from a wealthy family. The poor were still poor, and the rich were still in charge.The Phili ppine revolution demonstrates what the power people can have when they unite and withdraw consent. The same dynamics apply, no matter what the issue. If Filipinos had decided to go on and struggle and fight for a more just division of wealth, the abolition of the military, and/ or a decentralized government that was more responsive to their needs, who knows what more amazing things they might have achieved.E. resultantTo conclude, there were social and governmental changes as a result of the Philippine Revolution. After Marcos was exiled, there was much more social freedom. Political leading could actually speak their mind and exiled. The people were given the right to enunciate their opinions and not be punished. What changed drastically was the government. The Philippines came from being an authoritarian state to a bicameral democratic country. The People Power Revolution of 1986 signified the whiz of the civilians and how they came to the aid of the military, which had long b een an instrument of repression and terror.F. SourcesBookRags Staff. 2005. Ferdinand Marcos. Available Online cited September 12, 2010 Available from http//www.bookrags.com/biography/ferdinand-marcos/.Dizon, Regina G. progress Holyoke College. http//www.mtholyoke.edu/rgdizon/classweb/worldpolitics/main.html (27 January 2010)People Power in the Philippines. http//www.fragmentsweb.org/TXT2/philiptx.html.In Defense of Marxism. http//www.marxist.com/perspectives-philippine-revolution080487.htm (30 January 2010)Kabayan Central. http//www.kabayancentral.com/book/ateneo/mb5503861.html.Mercado, Monina A. People Power The Philippine Revolution of 1986 An Eyewitness History. Manila James B. Reuter, S.J. Foundation.Morrow, Paul. Maharlika and the old-fashioned class system. http//www.pilipino-express.com/history a-culture/in-other-words/251-maharlika-and-the-ancient-class-system.html (accessed 2010).Onwar.com.USA Spain Philippine Revolution. http//www.onwar.com/aced/data/Philippines1986.htm. (2 February 2010)Rodao, Florentino, and Felice N. Rodiguez. The Philippine Revolution of 1986 Ordinary Lives in Extraordinary Times. Manila Ateneo de Manila University Press.